I'm looking forward to seeing additional insights as I continue through Tanya.
Wednesday, December 1, 2021
Response to Tanya, Likutei Amarim, beginning of Chapter 3
Sunday, November 7, 2021
More and Better Blessings
It is interesting to see how the blessings given from father to son develop in a certain trajectory over the course of the book of Bereshit/Genesis in the lives of the Avot/Patriarchs. The blessings are better and more abundant with each generation.
Abraham does not bless his son Isaac – in fact, the only recorded words they exchange are during the Akedah. Isaac does not return with Abraham from the Akedah (it states in Genesis 22:19 that “Abraham returned to his servants” – the absence of Isaac being quite notable – there are many midrashic explanations for why this is, but suffice it to say that they go their separate ways). Even when Abraham sends his servant to find a wife for Isaac, Abraham seems not to have told Isaac what was happening – the text states that “The servant told Isaac all the things he had done” (Gen. 24:66). It is also notable that, for the marriage, Isaac brings Rebecca into the tent of his mother Sarah – with no mention of Abraham. The rupture between father and son after Abraham attempted to murder his son Isaac – even though it was stopped by the angel – is complete.
When Abraham dies, the text states that “After the death of Abraham, G!d blessed his son Isaac” (Gen 25:11) – and the rabbinic commentators state that, although G!d gave Abraham the power to bless, he failed to bless Isaac, and therefore G!d has to give the blessing Abraham was supposed to have made, which is why the text refers to Isaac as “his son” in this verse. It should be noted that there is also no mention of Abraham blessing Ishmael or any of the children he had with Keturah, although he gives the latter gifts before sending them away (Gen 25:6).
Isaac has only one good blessing to give, with two sons. Esau is meant to get the blessing, but after Jacob sends him out to hunt some game to prepare for him, Rebecca engages in subterfuge by having Jacob prepare a goat and putting the skin of the goat on his arms to seem hairy like his brother. Some have argued that Isaac knows what was going on, since he even acknowledges that “the voice is the voice of Jacob, yet the hands are the hands of Esau” (Gen. 27:22). But regardless of whether or not he knows on some level that Jacob is getting the blessing meant for Esau, there is only one good blessing. The consolation prize blessing that Esau ends up with was not really much of a blessing. And similar to the rupture between Abraham and Isaac, there is a long-term rupture between Jacob and Esau. The text suggests that it is healed when Esau kisses Jacob long after their parents’ death and they weep together – but there is even midrash that suggests that he tries to bite Jacob and that it is not a true reconciliation (Gen 33:4).
Jacob has twelve sons and he has more than one good blessing to give – but he also uses the opportunity to chew some of the sons out for their past behavior from many years earlier. By my reading, four of the blessings are “bad blessings” (Reuben, Simeon, Levi, and Issachar – four of Leah’s six children), five are “good blessings” (Judah and Zebulun from Leah’s sons, Joseph from Rachel’s sons, Naphtali from Bilhah’s sons, and Asher from Zilpah’s sons), while the remaining three I would regard as questions – not obviously good OR bad (Benjamin from Rachel’s sons, Dan from Bilhah’s sons, and Gad from Leah’s sons). (I would also note that Gad’s blessing is used in some versions [said three times!] of the Bedtime Shema as well as being recited after Shacharit as part of the prayer upon leaving the synagogue - and a line that may be part of Dan’s blessing or may be an interpolated utterance of praise immediately afterward [“For Thy salvation I wait, O Lord”] is also said both as part of the bedtime Shema [said three times each of three permutations of the three Hebrew words!!!] and by some both at the beginning and after the conclusion of Shacharit.) So, after no blessing for Isaac and one good blessing and one bad blessing for Isaac’s sons, we’ve moved to a situation where there are good and bad blessings (and perhaps even mixed blessing), but not limited by number, only by character of the sons receiving the blessing. I presented this teaching at an early morning Tikkun Leil Shavuot and someone mentioned in response that perhaps the bad blessings that Jacob gives his sons are instances of appropriate tochechah, or rebuke. To be sure, the sons receiving the bad blessings have done very bad things worthy of rebuke! But Jacob had ample opportunity to rebuke them prior to his deathbed blessings, and I still think that there should be good blessings for all of them at this point, even if there had been rebuke on other occasions. His lack of prior resolution of the relationships – similar to Abraham and Isaac’s relationship (if here caused by his sons and not by the father) is not a positive trait.
Finally, we move to Jacob’s blessing of his grandsons Ephraim and Manasseh. (To be sure, this happens just before the blessing of his twelve sons, but I believe that the blessing represents a generational shift along the trajectory of more and better blessings.) It is interesting that on Friday nights, Jewish parents give their daughters the expected blessing to be like the four recognized matriarchs, Sarah, Rebecca, Rachel, and Leah. (I am among those who believe the list should be expanded to include Bilhah and Zilpah, but that is for another time.) But rather than blessing their sons like the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the blessing is to be like Ephraim and Manasseh. The rabbis comment that this is the case because they are the first generation where the brothers get along with each other in peace. I wonder if this is the case because they are blessed with the same awesome blessing – a blessing that recalls the legacy of Abraham and Isaac:
The
G!d before whom my fathers Abraham and Isaac did walk, the G!d who hath been my
shepherd all my life long unto this day, the angel who hath redeemed me from
all evil, bless the lads; and let my name be named in them, and the name of my
fathers Abraham and Isaac; and let them grow into a multitude in the midst of
the earth.
(Genesis 48:15-16)
I believe that this blessing is a tikkun, a repair,
for the absence, stinginess, and vindictiveness of the blessings of the prior
generations – by mentioning Abraham and Isaac and thanking G!d for G!d’s
blessings upon his own life, he heals and repairs the harm of their blessings
(or absence thereof) as well as the blessings he is about to give his own sons.
To be sure, he insists on putting the right hand
on the younger son’s head and the left hand on the older son’s head, insisting
(as has been the case throughout Genesis) that the younger will be greater than
the older. I believe that, looking at the progression of blessings that happens
through the generations, we are called by the G!d of blessing to make our own
lives full of ever more abundant and better blessings to those with whom we
come in contact and the earth and all of its creatures. We are called to make
tikkun constantly, for our ancestors and for ourselves, as Jacob does in his
blessing of Ephraim and Manasseh. And the first tikkun I would invite us to
make is to stop seeing in those we bless as “greater” or “lesser”. My parents
were raised in generation where the school systems tried to “correct”
left-handedness and force left-handed children to learn to be right-handed – we
see this bias in the English language with words from the Latin – “dexterity” comes
from the word for “right-handed” and “sinister” comes from the word for “left-handed”.
Now, children are allowed to write with the hand they prefer and the gifts of
left-handed children are accepted. (I do applaud the Jewish tradition for allowing
left-handed people to don tefillin on their right hand and arm, in an early
recognition of the value of this diversity.) Maybe we can reframe the left and
right hands being on their heads as saying that both the right-hand blessing
and the left-hand blessing are equally valuable and necessary – and it is important
for Ephraim and Manasseh to each receive the particular blessing that fits
their personality – without making it a competition about who is greater and
who is lesser. Perhaps, given how they get along in peace, they made this
tikkun for themselves.
May our lives be full of berachot, of blessings,
for ourselves, for others, for our world, and for G!d – may we be ever more
open to G!d’s blessings for our lives and G!d’s requests for us to be channels
of those blessings for others, and may we constantly make tikkun where it is
needed. Amen.
Jacob and Esau in the Womb and at Birth
וַיֶּעְתַּ֨ר יִצְחָ֤ק לַֽיהֹוָה֙ לְנֹ֣כַח אִשְׁתּ֔וֹ כִּ֥י עֲקָרָ֖ה הִ֑וא וַיֵּעָ֤תֶר לוֹ֙ יְהֹוָ֔ה וַתַּ֖הַר רִבְקָ֥ה אִשְׁתּֽוֹ׃ And Isaac entreated the LORD for his wife, because she was barren; and the LORD let Himself be entreated of him, and Rebekah his wife conceived.
וַיִּתְרֹֽצְצ֤וּ
הַבָּנִים֙ בְּקִרְבָּ֔הּ וַתֹּ֣אמֶר אִם־כֵּ֔ן לָ֥מָּה זֶּ֖ה אָנֹ֑כִי וַתֵּ֖לֶךְ
לִדְרֹ֥שׁ אֶת־יְהֹוָֽה׃ And the children struggled together within her;
and she said: ‘If it be so, wherefore do I live?’ And she went to inquire of
the LORD.
וַיֹּ֨אמֶר
יְהֹוָ֜ה לָ֗הּ שְׁנֵ֤י (גיים) [גוֹיִם֙] בְּבִטְנֵ֔ךְ וּשְׁנֵ֣י לְאֻמִּ֔ים מִמֵּעַ֖יִךְ
יִפָּרֵ֑דוּ וּלְאֹם֙ מִלְאֹ֣ם יֶֽאֱמָ֔ץ וְרַ֖ב יַעֲבֹ֥ד צָעִֽיר׃ And the LORD said unto her:
Two nations are in thy womb, And two peoples shall be separated from thy
bowels; And the one people shall be stronger than the other people; And the
elder shall serve the younger.
וַיִּמְלְא֥וּ
יָמֶ֖יהָ לָלֶ֑דֶת וְהִנֵּ֥ה תוֹמִ֖ם בְּבִטְנָֽהּ׃ And when her days to be delivered were
fulfilled, behold, there were twins in her womb.
וַיֵּצֵ֤א
הָרִאשׁוֹן֙ אַדְמוֹנִ֔י כֻּלּ֖וֹ כְּאַדֶּ֣רֶת שֵׂעָ֑ר וַיִּקְרְא֥וּ שְׁמ֖וֹ
עֵשָֽׂו׃ And the first came forth ruddy, all over like a hairy mantle; and they
called his name Esau.
וְאַֽחֲרֵי־כֵ֞ן
יָצָ֣א אָחִ֗יו וְיָד֤וֹ אֹחֶ֙זֶת֙ בַּעֲקֵ֣ב עֵשָׂ֔ו וַיִּקְרָ֥א שְׁמ֖וֹ
יַעֲקֹ֑ב וְיִצְחָ֛ק בֶּן־שִׁשִּׁ֥ים שָׁנָ֖ה בְּלֶ֥דֶת אֹתָֽם׃ And after that came forth
his brother, and his hand had hold on Esau’s heel; and his name was called
Jacob. And Isaac was threescore years old when she bore them.
(Genesis 25:21-26)
I believe that Jacob and Esau were meant to be loving brothers and that the
way they were treated by their parents, with each parent picking a favorite and
with there being only one birthright and one decent blessing, had a negative
effect on both of them, with Esau having the worse treatment and the worse
effect on his life. I also believe that the story of their sojourn in the womb,
G!d’s prophecy about them given to Rebecca, and their birth can be reframed in
a way that is faithful to the text that can create a potential reality in which,
rather than be bitter rivals, they could have become the closest of friends.
First, the verb used to describe their relationship in the womb, וַיִּתְרֹֽצְצ֤וּ, can be read a
couple of ways. Ibn Ezra and others argue that the verb is related to the shoresh
רוץ, “to run”, pointing to Nahum 2:5, where the verb is applied
to lightning, meaning “running to and fro”. Read it this way, it can be seen as
the two brothers playing by running to and fro (similar to my two kittens, who
love to run back and forth across the room, scattering papers in their wake).
Even read as “struggle” or “crush each other”, from the root רצץ, it can be
seen as two brothers playfully wrestling with each other. Or perhaps they were
struggling to grow – and rather than struggling with each other, each was
struggling with himself in the process of growth. And in terms of crushing, perhaps
it can be seen as being crushed from the lack of expansiveness, even in the
womb, that Isaac and Rebecca were willing to give them, since Rebecca sees the
struggle as a problem – had it been interpreted as playfulness, perhaps there
would not have been crushing.
But what of G!d’s words about them? It says that one
nation shall be stronger than the other – but it could also be read that one
nation shall be strong and courageous FROM the other – that is, the two nations
could make each other strong and courageous through friendship rather than competition.
And the elder serving the younger? This could also be read as the greater
serving the weaker – and “serve” could be read as joyful service and work,
rather than a servile forced service. G!d’s words, had Isaac and Rebecca treated
their sons differently, could have been lived out in a very different and more
life-giving way. G!d answered Rebecca’s inquiry – but it was up to her and Isaac
to determine HOW the words would come true – whether in a life-giving way, with
the two brothers strengthening and encouraging one another in mutual service,
or in a destructive way, each strengthening himself at the expense of the other
and with one necessarily dominating the other.
Finally, Jacob came out of the womb holding Esau’s heel –
and this was seen as Jacob trying to supplant Esau and to replace him as the
firstborn. But what if, as loving twins, this could be seen as Jacob not
wanting to be left alone in the womb, to be separated from his brother whom he
loves, but instead wanting to remain together and grasping his heel as a sign
of love? What if – instead of Jacob – Supplanter/Heel – he had been named Ohev –
Lover – to show that his action was an act of love, not bitter rivalry?
I choose to read this story in a way that opens up
unrealized possibilities – that Jacob and Esau had the potential to be loving brothers
and not enemies – a potential finally realized when they reconcile and Esau
kisses Jacob – that could have been realized much earlier. That is how I choose
to read the text of Scripture, in ways that open up lifegiving possibilities if
I wrestle with the text and demand a blessing.
Friday, November 5, 2021
Yitzchok/Isaac Loved Conditionally – Rivka/Rebecca Loves Unconditionally
וַיֶּאֱהַ֥ב יִצְחָ֛ק אֶת־עֵשָׂ֖ו כִּי־צַ֣יִד בְּפִ֑יו וְרִבְקָ֖ה אֹהֶ֥בֶת אֶֽת־יַעֲקֹֽב׃
Now
Isaac loved Esau, because he did eat of his venison; and Rebekah loved Jacob.
-
Bereishit/Genesis 25:28
Something
that strikes me about this psuk/verse is that Yitzchok/Isaac loved Esav
conditionally – that is, a reason is given for his love of Esav – that he ate
of the food Esav provided (literally, “Yitzchok loved Esav because the game was
in his mouth”). There are various interesting rabbinic commentaries about what,
exactly, this means – and I encourage you to check them out – but the main
thing that jumps out at me is that Yitzchok does not love Esav unconditionally,
because he is his son – rather, he loves him because of what Esav can do for
Yitzchok.
In
contrast, Rivka/Rebecca loves Yaacov/Jacob. No reason is given. No
justification. She just loves him. Now, the rabbis come up with various reasons
why she loves him – but these are additions to the text – no reason is given,
in contrast to the reason given for Yitzchok’s love for Esav. The most
interesting commentary to me comes from the Chizkuni (unsurprisingly – I often find
his commentary very illuminating) – the verb used for Yitzchok is in the
perfect, or past tense – because the love is conditional and will at times
cease to exist. However, the love provided by Rivka is described in the kal
participle, effectively the present tense – because it continues at all times.
He does not quite make the leap to it being unconditional, but I think this
makes sense as a reading of the psuk/verse.
I
believe that the conditional love that Esav received from his father contributed
to his path in life being very negative. He takes much longer to mature – when he
sees how displeased that his father was with his choice of wives, so he marries
a cousin, a daughter of Yishmael/Ishmael – just to please his parents, not out
of love. Meanwhile, the unconditional love that Rivka generously gives Yaakov
helps set him on a better path, being able to have a profound experience of prayer
in his dream of the ladder to heaven with the angels, choosing a wife he loves,
Rachel (we won’t get into his marriage to her sister Leah at this time), and
wrestling with the man/angel/G!d who gave him his new name.
Of
course, the fact that each parent had a favorite child set them up for
conflict, and there was bitter rivalry that led Yaakov to trick first his
brother and then his father to get the birthright and the good blessing – one
wonders how different the story would have been if both sons were loved equally
and if there were good blessings and birthrights for both of them. In the end, in
Bereishit/Genesis 33:4, Esav is able to kiss his brother and they embrace (yes,
I know of the midrash that assigns very negative motives to Esav for this – but
I like the positive possibilities inherent in the pshat, or literal reading, of
this verse.) And Bereishit/Genesis 36 gives a detailed genealogy of Esav’s descendants,
which does not necessarily make sense given the broader context of the book and
of the Torah – and there is rabbinic commentary that this perek/chapter
contains some of the deepest Kabbalistic mysteries – which I see as making up
for the lack of unconditional love from his parents.
I
find that the family relationships in Bereshit/Genesis are so revelatory, and
this set of relationships is no exception.
Ahavat Yisrael
Rabbi Shai Held asked on Facebook for brief answers to what this phrase conjures up and here is my answer:
Not the pshat - but the love of Yisrael, Yaakov renamed, for G!d who is willing to wrestle with G!d and demand a blessing. Only one with that ahavat Yisrael for Hashem can hear the words of the Shema addressed to those who wrestle with G!d. And the more conventional ahavat Yisrael is love for others who wrestle similarly, forging a community to wrestle with Hashem and the Torah and how best to create the community of Israel.
Monday, September 13, 2021
Questions for Seder HaAvodah on Yom Kippur
1. The night of Yom Kippur, the Cohen Gadol learns Divrei HaYamim/Chronicles (the first Kingdoms of Judah/Israel), Daniel (in exile), Ezra/Nechemiah (return from exile), and Iyov/Job (written by a non-Jew). What texts (Jewish or secular, written/visual art/music/dance/stage/film/TV) would be most helpful to you in preparing for the Avodah on Yom Kippur if you were the Cohen Gadol – and why? What selection of two to four such texts would represent the fullness of what you want to bring to the Avodah of Yom Kippur – and why?
2. The Cohen Gadol/High Priest presses down on the head of the bull (his sin-offering) and the goat sent to Azazel (the sins of Israel) and makes confession of sins – a total of three. Which three sins or other situations that separate you from G!d and/or others and/or yourself do you most want to press into the goat sent into the wilderness and be free from this year?
3. According to Tractate Yoma of the Mishnah and Talmud, Yom Kippur only atones for sins between a person and G!d – one must make peace with other people. What are the things you need to atone for with G!d? With others? With yourself?
4. What has been the best Yom Kippur observance for you and why? What can you bring from that experience into this year’s Yom Kippur?
Wednesday, September 1, 2021
Thought for the Siyyum of Masechet Sukkah
"The Gemara relates that the Sages said of Yonatan ben Uzziel, the greatest of Hillel’s students, that when he sat and was engaged in Torah study, the sanctity that he generated was so intense that any bird that flew over him was immediately incinerated." (Sukkah 28a)
Rav Yonatan was the translator who produced Targum Yonatan, the Aramaic translation of the Prophets. The bird being incinerated by the holiness of the Torah study speaks to Torah study taking the place of the korban olah (burnt-offering) in the absence of the Temple.
May our Torah study and our translation of that Torah into the targum of our lives serve as a pleasing offering to G!d.
Why I Mourn the Loss of the Temple
As we go through the Nine Days preparing to mourn the loss of the Beit HaMikdash, the Temple, on Tisha B’Av, the saddest day on the Jewish c...
-
As many people know, I have been obsessed with the Akedah for decades. I even chose Yitzchok as half of my Hebrew name as a direct result. M...
-
In the summary of this past Shabbat that I posted last night, I included a joke that I came up with Friday night. A rabbi friend in the comm...
-
One of my most fundamental theological beliefs - one that has remained unchanged despite the many changes in religious affiliations througho...